This blog focuses on nutrition and its effects on all aspects of life, which includes fitness. There are certain nutritional needs and concerns when it comes to an athlete or anyone who wants to live a healthy, active lifestyle. Optimal nutrition is an essential part of every athlete's training program (Heber 139). The primary areas of concern are: 1) consuming enough calories to support performance, 2) consuming the correct balance of macronutrients before, during, and after exercise, and 3) proper hydration (Heber 139). "Facts about Fitness" entries will focus on these components.
 |
| When it comes to food, it ultimately becomes the fuel we use for everyday living. |
Recall That...
In the previous week, I discussed about exercise and how we need over 200 minutes per week (~30 minutes per day) to maintain weight loss (Heber 152). As a result, we ask ourselves, "Why does it take so much exercise to maintain weight and why doesn't exercise help with short-term weight loss induced by diet?" From this question, we will look at energetics and metabolism of anaerobic and aerobic exercise. Buckle your seat belts, ladies and gentlemen, we are about to look at some biochemistry. Awesome!!!
Fuel Utilization During Exercise (Heber 152-153)
Skeletal muscle requires energy to relax. Contraction is an automatic process once calcium channels are opened, resulting in the binding of calcium to troponin (i.e. a protein that inhibits the movement of actin and myosin muscle fibers). Therefore, once troponin is inactivated by calcium, muscle contracts.
Under most circumstances, fat and carbohydrates are utilized as fuels during exercise. The degree to which each fuel acts as the primary or secondary source of energy and the efficiency with which energy is utilized depends on the prior nutrition of the athlete and the intensity and duration of the exercise. At low levels of prolonged exercise, most energy needs come from fat and lesser energy needs come from carbohydrate. At higher intensity, carbohydrate plays a greater role but is limited in its duration of action. Protein only plays a minor role at very high levels of energy utilization, but adequate protein intake is critical for maintenance of lean body mass to enable exercise performance.
Energy is extracted from foods in the body by converting the chemical energy stored in chemical bonds to high energy phosphate bonds in ATP (Adenosine Triphosphate). This high energy bond can be used in a number of biochemical reactions as a fuel with conversion of ATP to ADP (adenosine diphosphate). If ADP begins to accumulate in the muscle, then an enzyme is activated in muscle to break down phosphocreatine (PCr) in order to restore ATP levels:
PCr + ADP → ATP + Cr
The creatine released from this reaction is converted to creatinine and excreted in the urine. The stores of PCr are extremely limited and could only support ATP levels for ~ 10 seconds if there were no other sources of ATP. Since ATP is provided from other sources, PCr ends up being a major energy source in the first minute of strenuous exercise. PCr has the major advantage of being localized in the muscle so that it can rapidly restore and maintain ATP levels for intense exercises (i.e. sprinting, jumping, lifting, and throwing).
Aerobic and Anaerobic Metabolism (Heber 153-156)
With moderate exertion, carbohydrate undergoes aerobic metabolism. Under these conditions, oxygen is used and the carbohydrate goes through both the Embden-Meyerhoff pathway of anaerobic metabolism in which glucose is converted to lactate. However, prior to conversion of pyruvate to lactate, pyruvate enters the Krebs Cycle in mitochondria where oxidative phosphorylation results in a maximum extraction of energy from each molecule of glucose. If there is plenty of oxygen available and the exercise is of low to moderate intensity, then the pyruvate from glucose is converted to carbon dioxide and water in mitochondria. In comparison, from a single glucose molecule,
Under aerobic (oxygen) conditions: 42 ATP
Under anaerobic (lack of oxygen) conditions: 4 ATP
A muscle cell has some amount of ATP floating around that it can use immediately, but not very much - only enough to last for ~3 seconds. To replenish the ATP levels quickly, muscle cells contain a high-energy phosphate compound called creatine phosphate. The phosphate group is removed from creatine phosphate by an enzyme called creatine kinase, and is transferred to ADP to form ATP. The cell turns ATP into ADP, and the phosphagen rapidly turns the ADP back into ATP. As the muscle continues to work, the creatine phosphate levels begin to decrease. Together, the ATP levels and creatine phosphate levels are called the phosphagen system. The phosphagen system can supply the energy needs of working muscle at a high rate, but only for 8 to 10 seconds.
Aerobic metabolism supplies energy more slowly than anaerobic metabolism, but can be sustained for long periods of time - up to 5 hours. The major advantage of the less efficient anaerobic pathway is that it rapidly provides ATP in muscle by utilizing local muscle glycogen. Other than PCr, it is the fastest way to resupply muscle ATP levels. Anaerobic glycolysis supplies most energy for short term intense exercise ranging from 30 seconds to 2 minutes. The disadvantages of anaerobic metabolism are that it cannot be sustained for long periods, since the accumulation of lactic acid in muscle decreases the pH and inactivates key enzymes in glycolysis pathway leading to fatigue. The lactic acid released from muscle can be taken up by the liver and converted back to glucose again (i.e. Cori Cycle), or it can be used as a fuel by the cardiac muscle directly or by less active skeletal muscles away from the actively contracting muscle.
Muscle glycogen is the preferred carbohydrate fuel for events lasting less than 2 hours for both aerobic and anaerobic metabolism. Depletion of muscle glycogen causes fatigue and is associated with a build-up of muscle lactate. Lactate production increases continuously but physiologists have defined a point at which breathing changes as a result of acid-base imbalance, anaerobic threshold. Both the nutrition and conditioning of the athlete will determine how much work can be performed in a specific exercise before fatigue sets in. Oxygen consumption can be measured directly or indirectly:
- Indirect measurement uses an exercise treadmill or stairway according to standard protocols and pulse is measured.
- The more conditioned athlete can produce the same amount of work at a lower pulse rate
- This indirect determination assumes that pulse rate is proportional to oxygen consumption
- Direct measurement can be done through exercise
- A motorized treadmill is usually used to increase the intensity of exercise until fatigue occurs
The amount of oxygen consumed just before exhaustion is the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Exercise intensity can be expressed as a percentage of VO2max. Low intensity (ex/ fast walking) would be 30-50% of VO2max. Jogging can demand 50-80% of VO2max depending on the intensity. Sprints can require from 85-150% of VO2max (with the added 50% coming from short term anaerobic energy production).
Application of energy storage: it is possible to build up glycogen stores prior to exercise to improve performance. With exercises lasting for more than 20-30 minutes, blood glucose becomes important as a fuel to spare muscle glycogen breakdown. Both aerobic and endurance training lead to increases in glycogen stores, triglycerides, oxidative enzymes, and increased number and size of mitochondria. Both the oxidative enzymes involved in the Krebs Cycle oxidation of glucose and the lipoprotein lipase needed to convert triglycerides to fatty acids are increased through training. This is not a general effect, but it is specific to the muscle and muscle fiber type being used for the exercise. Slow twitch muscle fibers provide for prolonged aerobic activity, while the fast-twitch muscle fibers are used for short intense activities.
For various activities, different systems are used:
- For 8-10 seconds (ex/ 100 m sprint) of exercise, the person would use the phosphagen system.
- For 1.3-1.6 minutes (ex/ 400 m swim) of exercise, the person would use the glycogen-lactic acid system.
- For unlimited time or prolonged time (ex/ marathon) of exercise, the person would use aerobic respiration.
Why fatigue? The fatigue that develops with intense exercise can be related to specific fiber types. In prolonged exercise at 60-75% of VO2max Type I fibers (red, slow twitch) and Type IIa (red, fast twitch) are recruited during the early stages of exercise; however, as intensity increases Type IIb fibers (white, fast twitch) must be recruited to maintain the same intensity. It requires more effort to recruit Type IIb fibers and they produce lactic acid. As the glycogen levels drop in the red muscle fibers, they will rely more on fat. Since fat is less efficient than carbohydrate, intensity will decrease (pace will slow).
Burning fat: At the other end of the spectrum, during mild exercise such as a brisk walk, muscles burn fat for fuel because the supply of ATP provided from fat is adequate to maintain intensity. Fatty acids are readily available from stored fat and the rate of lipolysis is 3 times the rate of fatty acid release at rest so that fatty acids can be supplied at an increased rate rapidly during the onset of low levels of exercise. So, while fat is not very useful for short term, intense exercise, it is a great advantage for increasingly prolonged exercise, especially when it is maintained at a low or moderate level of intensity.
Why fat? The advantage of fat as a fuel is that it provides extensive stores of calories in an easily portable form. Since fat is not hydrated, it weighs much less per unit calorie than protein or carbohydrate (9 Cal/g of fat vs. 4 Cal/g of carbohydrate or protein). When you compare the number of ATP produced per carbon atom, fat is also more efficient. A 6-carbon glucose molecule produces 36-38 ATP on average (6 ATP/carbon). On the other hand, an 18-carbon fatty acid produces 147 ATP on average (8.2 ATP/carbon). However, carbohydrate is more efficient than fat when the amount of ATP produced per unit of oxygen consumed is considered. 6 oxygen molecules are required to metabolize 6-carbon glucose, producing 36 ATP (6 ATP/oxygen), while 26 oxygen molecules are required to produce 147 ATP from an 18-carbon fatty acid (5.7 ATP/oxygen). Therefore, for a performance athlete, it is important to maintain the efficiency edge provided by carbohydrate as long as glycogen is available in the muscles. Under usual exercise conditions, protein only provides 6% of energy needs. With high intensity endurance exercise, the production of glucose from amino acids can be significant up to ~10-15% of total energy needs. The food that provides energy for short-term fast-paced exercise is carbohydrate, while slow steady aerobic exercise uses all 3 primary fuels - primarily fat and carbohydrate.
How Do Fuels Compare? A Lesson in Cooking
For this week, I decided to compare my old lifestyle with my new lifestyle that I am currently striving for with better nutrition. During my childhood, I always enjoyed fast food. Because my parents had to work a 9am-5pm job (or even later), they often opted out with the most convenient option: fast food. Every night would be different: Carl's Jr, McDonalds, In-n-out, Jack-in-the-Box, Thai take-out, Chinese take-out, Cambodian take-out, and many more. This was the norm while I was growing up. Time and convenience definitely play a factor when it comes to the food we eat. We all want to eat what is best for us, we all want to make the rest decision. However, that is not always the case when it comes to everyday living. As a college student who will be soon making my own decisions, I want to strive to a new lifestyle that consists of a better diet with fast food as a moderation, not a norm.
So, I decided to compare chicken burgers: one from a fast food chain (left) and the other from home-made (right).
This entry will do a comparison and contrast that encompasses various factors (i.e. cost, time, calories, etc.)
Their Take of the Chicken Burger:
 |
| Chicken burger from the fast food restaurant |
First, the chicken burger from the fast food chain. This burger costed me $1.00 (+tax) and took me 25 minutes to walk to and from the restaurant. It consisted of a breaded chick patty with lettuce and mayo-onion sauce on a regular, white-breaded bun. The nutritional facts were taken from the restaurant's website and include:
- 415 Calories (185 Calories from fat)
- 21 g of total fat (3 g of saturated fat)
- 32 mg of cholesterol
- 882 mg of sodium
- 42 g of carbohydrates
- 2 g of dietary fiber
- 4 g of sugars
- 15 g of protein
In terms of taste, it lived up to its price. It tasted plain and didn't really have any flavors. It was okay at best. I am no food critic, but it was plain in its overall presentation. These were usually the burgers that I ate growing up. Overall, it is cheap and convenient, but lacks taste and nutritional value.
My Take on the Chicken Burger:
 |
| Homemade version of the chicken burger |
In comparison, I made my own version of the chicken burger, trying to make an exact copy with a twist: healthier ingredients. This burger costed me ~$1.26 (+tax, costs split below) and took me about 1 hour total to make and clean up (30 minutes to walk to and from the grocery store). Estimated costs came to be:
- $0.98 for a bundle of kale → $0.05 for a part of a kale leaf
- $6.10 for raw chicken breast → $0.34 for the chicken patty
- $2.99 for whole-wheat buns → $0.27 for one bun
- $1.99 for the mustard bottle → $0.05 for spreading it onto the buns
- ~$0.50 for the spices (salt, turmeric, and paprika) and oil
It took me about an hour total to make. I had to slice and prep the chicken, wash the kale, spread the mustard onto the buns, and assembled it all together. That's it. For the chicken patty, I decided to grill it with olive oil and various spices. That way, it would be able to get it a kick in terms of taste.
 |
| For my take, I cooked the chicken breast with olive oil and various spices (salt, turmeric, and paprika) |
 |
| After the chicken was cooked, I allowed it to rest and have the oil soaked up with napkins. |
Unlike the fast food restaurant, I got a choice of how my food was prepared and made - and that made all of the difference. In contrast to the fast food chicken burger, using a recipe counter, I found that the nutritional values differ (fast food values in brackets) by:
- 268.4 Calories vs. [415 Calories]
- 8.6 g of total fat (1.6 g of saturated fat) vs. [21 g of total fat (3 g of saturated fat)]
- 36.6 mg of cholesterol vs. [32 mg of cholesterol]
- 411.0 mg of sodium vs. [882 mg of sodium]
- 28.3 g of carbohydrates vs. [42 g of carbohydrates]
- 5.4 g of dietary fiber vs. [2 g of dietary fiber]
- 2.3 g of sugar vs. [4 g of sugars]
- 20.1 g of protein vs. [15 g of protein]
Wow...I was really surprised by these numbers, especially the fat content being 1/3 of the fast food chicken burger. From the contrast, we see a decrease in calories, sodium, carbs, and sugar, while an increase in dietary fiber, protein, and cholesterol (slightly). Based on this contrast, it shows that my homemade version of the chicken burger is a healthier option. It consisted of what we are looking for (minus the increase in cholesterol): lower fat, salt, and sugar content as well as higher protein and fiber content. To keep things into perspective, the cholesterol increase can be accounted for by having a higher ratio of good cholesterol to bad cholesterol (HDL:LDL ratio) as opposed to the fast food version with the use of olive oil and grilling our chicken instead of breading and deep frying it.
Lesson Learned: Overall, because I got to choose which ingredients to put in and substitute, I was able to control and see the quality of my food. From this compare and contrast, I learned that food is only limited to our imagination. There are plenty of factors that come into play (cost, eating out with friends, convenience, food options, etc.). The only benefit that I saw from the fast food version of the chicken burger was the convenience (it took ~1/3 of the time to have the burger ready as opposed to cooking it). Besides that, the homemade chicken burger trumps the fast food chicken burger, which comes to show that eating healthy isn't impossible. Eating healthier can be a bit more expensive in the short-run, but in the long-run, it can save money with all of the savings in buying and cooking in bulk. With all of the options out there, it is up to us to decide food we consume and ultimately become our fuel and building blocks for our health.
 |
| With the first picture of this entry with fast food, I now prefer this picture with homemade food. Along with the chicken burger, I made some stir-fried chicken rice with red peppers, onions, kale, and spinach. |
Looking at the bigger picture, the food we take into our bodies becomes the building blocks necessary for life. The energy we need for the day, our physical appearances and chemical/hormonal balance, and our mental health all depend on the fuel we run on. Like a car, the matter of fuel we put into the tank matters. Put in the good stuff and it performs at its optimal level; put in the bad stuff and it performs at its sub-optimal level. The same applies to the human body, as it acts a fully-functioning machine. It is always good to keep things into perspective: short-term vs. long-term.
Information about fuel utilization during exercise and metabolism was taken from Dr. Heber's course reader, Winter 2014 (pages have been cited). All photos were taken by me.